Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
Mad Willyum Bonney wrote:I came across an article sometime last year so the details are sketchy .
A study concerned human perception are something within that realm .
The researchers displayed text that was missing all the vowels and possibly other letters .
They found that only 40% of test subjects were able to read it without a struggle , the other 60% took forever to read the thing , or saw " chicken scratch " , it might as well be a foreign language.
It seems the former group's brains somehow simply filled in the blanks for them as they read the text .
So PG , give these folks a break , they are of the 60% .
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, olny taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pcleas. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by ilstef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Zankou 2.0 wrote:Mad Willyum Bonney wrote:I came across an article sometime last year so the details are sketchy .
A study concerned human perception are something within that realm .
The researchers displayed text that was missing all the vowels and possibly other letters .
They found that only 40% of test subjects were able to read it without a struggle , the other 60% took forever to read the thing , or saw " chicken scratch " , it might as well be a foreign language.
It seems the former group's brains somehow simply filled in the blanks for them as they read the text .
So PG , give these folks a break , they are of the 60% .
You aren't removing the vowels, you are entirely changing the spelling and syntax.
Detective TurtleHolmes wrote:Zankou 2.0 wrote:Mad Willyum Bonney wrote:I came across an article sometime last year so the details are sketchy .
A study concerned human perception are something within that realm .
The researchers displayed text that was missing all the vowels and possibly other letters .
They found that only 40% of test subjects were able to read it without a struggle , the other 60% took forever to read the thing , or saw " chicken scratch " , it might as well be a foreign language.
It seems the former group's brains somehow simply filled in the blanks for them as they read the text .
So PG , give these folks a break , they are of the 60% .
You aren't removing the vowels, you are entirely changing the spelling and syntax.
I agr. Thr shld b lss f ths crp tlk sppsd 2 lk lk txt tlk?
Mad Willyum Bonney wrote:Yarr PG ! Thet be et , oi red thet widdowt skippin a beet , ok oi be amittin pirt be much moor diff cult , specially wen ye chain ye styl wun day tada necks .
Messin widda werds loike dis an addling ack cents reely messuz up thee noobs .
Oi fine PoN and ArrrrrrNA bull slow me reeding , they hasit doan pat an kingo to thee exstream loike dis .
Jus look at dis miss , iffen oi be a noob oi be goan bonkarrs !
PantyGnawer wrote:Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, olny taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pcleas. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by ilstef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
PantyGnawer wrote:Can we cut out sarcasm, euphanism, metaphor, and analogy as well because those really tend to confuse me as well?
Zankou 2.0 wrote:Mad Willyum Bonney wrote:I came across an article sometime last year so the details are sketchy .
A study concerned human perception are something within that realm .
The researchers displayed text that was missing all the vowels and possibly other letters .
They found that only 40% of test subjects were able to read it without a struggle , the other 60% took forever to read the thing , or saw " chicken scratch " , it might as well be a foreign language.
It seems the former group's brains somehow simply filled in the blanks for them as they read the text .
So PG , give these folks a break , they are of the 60% .
You aren't removing the vowels, you are entirely changing the spelling and syntax.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests