Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
elijah wrote:Ubi Dubium wrote:He does not answer the questions he is asked, intead, he answers the ones he wishes had been asked.
Can I respond to that?
Since the confused impressions presented do not demonstrate a needful relevance for the such information to become admissible, my previous refusal remains.
I would not call the question "easy", even if because of the nomenclatural nonsensicality with which it has thus far been posed. I agree that the arguments made have defined failure, so then no truce is necessary.
stott_s wrote:OMFG, I have been away a long time for one reason or another, and I can't believe this thread is STILL running! Why are you all feeding this thing?
DaveL wrote:Elijah this for you...
Zankou 2.0 wrote:DaveL wrote:Elijah this for you...
I did that already.
Zankou 2.0 wrote:This is where your argument fails. We are NOT deliberately seeking to malign you.elijah wrote:A punning phrase that deliberately seeks to malign individuals is slander whether it rhymes or not.Ubi Dubium wrote:Sorry, having a rhyming name isn't slander.
Users browsing this forum: MiltonOa and 2 guests